clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

ASU Football: Behind Enemy Lines with CougCenter

We get the inside scoop on Washington State from the staff at our sister site CougCenter.

NCAA Football: UCLA at Washington State James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

Tomorrow’s battle with the Washington State Cougars is just over 24 hours away, but we’ve still got some questions for our visitors from the North.

Thankfully, our Washington State sister site CougCenter was gracious enough to help us out. Below, our friend Jeff Nusser talks expectations, the differences between this year’s Cougar team and the one we saw last year, and much more.

To view our answers to Jeff’s questions, click here.

House of Sparky: Washington State has gone from a team that lost its season opener against an FCS team (granted, it was against a good Eastern Washington team) to one of the hottest teams in the Pac-12. Have the Cougars surpassed your preseason expectations?

Jeff Nusser: I’d say they are probably right at the median preseason expectation at this point. Nobody expected them to lose to an FCS team (AGAIN), so there are some who surely will say they are below expectations simply because of that. But then there are those -- like myself -- who didn’t expect them to make it through this Oregon-Stanford-UCLA stretch unscathed.

So, on balance, sitting at 3-0 atop the Pac-12 North with Washington probably evens it out. They’re currently playing like the team we all expected coming into the season.

HoS: What's the biggest difference between this Washington State team and the one we saw last year up in Pullman?

JN: Probably the fact that they can run the ball a lot more effectively. The Air Raid is always going to be pass happy, but it’s at its most effective when it can take advantage of favorable defensive fronts by gashing the opponent on the ground. The Cougars have proven this year that they can do that if a defense isn’t respecting the run game.

Washington State didn’t run it real effectively against UCLA, but a lot of that had to do with the Bruins, who feature a future NFL nose tackle and often made sure there were six guys in the box to deter the Cougars from running. I’m not sure there are any teams in the Pac-12 outside of UCLA and Washington who can employ that strategy and still stifle the passing game to some degree.

HoS: Mike Leach's teams have been known for their less-than-stellar defensive units in years past, but after finishing 97th in the country in yards allowed a season ago, the Cougars are up to 54th halfway through the 2016 campaign. What's been the biggest change you have noticed on the defensive side of the football?

JN: A couple of things. First, the defensive line has come alive. That area of the defense was a big question mark coming into the season, and it sure looked after the first couple of games that it was going to be a problem area.

They were mediocre against the run and got next-to-no pressure on the quarterback. Now, led by Hercules Mata’afa, they’re disrupting things again. They made life absolutely miserable for Christian McCaffrey and pretty much set up shop in UCLA’s backfield.

Second, Shalom Luani -- a preseason pick by many as an all-conference safety -- has dropped down into the nickel position, which is more akin to the Arizona Cardinals’ “moneybacker” position pioneered by Washington State alum Deone Bucannon. He’s giving the Cougars a tremendous boost in their run defense, but is flexible enough to drop back into coverage and gum things up. It was a bit of an accident that came about when previous starter Parker Henry went down with an injury, but it’s been a boon for the team.

(It also doesn’t hurt that Stanford and UCLA are super awful offensively at the moment.)

HoS: Speaking of Leach, what are your thoughts on Arizona State's alleged sign stealing? Is this just Leach being Leach?

JN: It’s 100 percent Leach being Leach. I think it’s funny that nobody seems to remember this from last year:

Unlike Oregon, which often tries to attack specific weaknesses in a defense, Leach’s offensive philosophy is predicated on the idea that you can’t defend the whole field even if you know what’s coming. So, it really doesn’t matter if you’ve figured out the signals, and if the opponent wants to expend energy on that, more power to them.

However, I’m really not sure why it is that he’s going after Graham specifically on this. He seems to have a pretty cordial relationship with the other coaches in the conference. Maybe it’s because he really believes ASU is doing things they shouldn’t -- coaches talk, and even if it’s not affecting him, he could be sympathetic to his colleagues -- but if I were to hazard a guess, I’d say it’s simply because Graham is so self-serious that his goat seems to be an easy one to get.

HoS: We know what Luke Falk gives Washington State through the air, but I'm more interested in the three-headed rushing attack that the Cougars can deploy in the ground game. What should we expect to see out of Jamal Morrow, James Williams, and Gerard Wicks, and what makes them different from each other?

J You should expect to see something like 30ish carries between them, with the load being distributed fairly equally. Wicks is a bruiser who doesn’t have much in the way of elusiveness, but he’ll get downhill in a hurry and hit someone. Williams, meanwhile, is much more elusive and explosive. He can hit people, for sure, but he’s also a home run threat anytime he touches the ball.

Morrow is a nice medium between the two -- a patient runner who is a bit elusive, but also big enough to get physical with a defender. It’s important to remember that all three are receiving weapons out of the backfield, as well -- particularly Morrow, who just has a nice feel for using blockers and picking up extra yards after a catch.